[miningmx.com] -- Eskom has reached an in principle deal with BHP Billiton that
will release it from a long-term tariff agreement that triggered
book value losses of billions last year, acting CEO Mpho Makwana
said on Tuesday.
However, attempts to renegotiate a similar contract with Anglo
American to remove liabilities also linked to embedded derivatives
was proving more difficult.
Eskom finance director Erica Johnson said this was due to the
recalcitrance of one of the parties to that contract, the Skorpion
Zinc mine in south-western Namibia.
"There has been a bit of a challenge, Skorpion Zinc has been
difficult to engage," Johnson told Parliament's portfolio committee
on public enterprise.
Anglo has contracts with Eskom that are regulated by tariff codes, with the Skorpion contract being the exception.
"The single contract of Skorpion
zinc mine in Namibia has been in place for many years, represents only 6% of Anglo American’s total power off-take from Eskom, or just 80 MW (02.%) of the 40,503 MW of Eskom’s total power output," an Anglo spokesman said.
"This contract, which has guaranteed offtake obligations on Anglo American, is an agreement that has historically been priced at close to the standard Eskom tariff," he said.
Anglo has put its zinc assets, including Skorpion, up for sale as part of a programme to dispose of non-core assets, raise capital and streamline the business.
Makwana said the contract with BHP Billiton to supply
electricity to the mining giant's Mozal and Hillside aluminium
smelters accounted for 95 percent of Eskom's embedded derivative
liabilities that led to a book value loss of R9.5 billion last
year.
He said Eskom had "been held to ransom by the long-standing
liability" on derivatives that linked the tariff to aluminium
prices, causing
problems when these plunged in the wake of the
global economic crisis.
The renegotiated contract with BHP Billiton was subject to audit
and should be signed at the end of May, he added.
But a defensive Makwana declined to answer questions from MPs on
whether Eskom had in the past been selling power to Billiton's
smelters for less than the cost of generating it.
Instead, he told committee chairwoman Vytjie Mentor he would
prefer to respond in writing as the issue was complex.
Makwana also threatened to take legal action against Democratic
Alliance MP Pieter van Dalen after he claimed to be in possession
of a "secret" internal document showing that Eskom had been
supplying power to the Mozal plant at 12 cents per kilowatt-hour.
The acting Eskom boss rejected notions that the company suffered
a loss in real terms after aluminium prices tumbled.
Makwana insisted that embedded derivatives would not become
an
issue had international financial reporting standards not changed
in the new millennium and forced the company to foreclose long-term
liabilities under the deal.
He said the deals with the mining houses had to be understood in
the context of South Africa's political commitments "to empower our
neighbours" under the New Partnership for Africa's Development
(Nepad) programme launched by former president Thabo Mbeki.
"We are taking this at face value when in fact other components
of value were embedded in this".
The deals with BHP Billiton and Anglo American have been blamed
for Eskom's cashflow and supply capacity problems, with
commentators saying the country's energy woes would be eradicated
if the deals were cancelled.
Makwana said the two contracts accounted for just under 10
percent of South Africa's electricity consumption. Public
Enterprises Minister Barbara Hogan had put the figure at
"approximately five percent" but
the CEO said this was because she
was referring to their share of peak-hour consumption.
Hogan has consistently refused to divulge finer details of the
deals, which were inked from 1994 onwards when South Africa had
excess electricity supply and sought to sell power cheaply to
attract investment.
The minister said indiscretion would make the country look
"silly".