miningmx
TODAY In Columnists ›
Marc Hasenfuss

Chrometco continues to limp on lime

Marc Hasenfuss | Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:23

Print this page Send this article to a friend Share
[miningmx.com] -- AT face value, small exploration company Chrometco looks like a lovely value opportunity.

Tangible net asset value of around 17 cents per share is made up almost entirely of the company’s R34m cash pile. With the share trading at 11c, there’s a rather attractive discount on the cash.

Now that would be a fantastic opportunity if Chrometco, which currently sits sans meaningful operational or exploration assets, were contemplating paying out that cash to shareholders.

Instead, a fair chunk of it will be set aside to buy into two exploration projects: Lime-Chem Minerals (a limestone deposit) and Summer Seas Trading 84 (a dolomite deposit). Chrometco has taken an initial 9.7% stake in the companies for a nominal sum, with a call option agreement to buy out the remaining shares at a cost determined by exploration results.

While the call option agreement looks like a safety first approach, there’s obviously something the market doesn’t like about the deal.

I’d guess the small minority stake, notwithstanding the call option agreement, raises questions about whether Chrometco will have any influence over the exploration projects in their early stages.

Its cautious approach might also be a letdown for shareholders, who might have wanted a more decisive advance. After all Chrometco had previously punted an agreement to acquire a 90% interest in Lime-Chem – a deal enticingly tagged to proposals to construct a 500 tonne/day kiln to convert its existing raw limestone and dolomite resources into higher value burnt lime and burnt dolomite.

Officially, Chrometco argued the proposed scale of the kiln project convinced the company – which isn’t “loaded” by exploration company standards – it would be better strategy to first acquire additional limestone and dolomite resources.

Fair enough. But Miningmx reckons evidence of some inspiring deal-making to secure further exploration deposits is needed before the market generates any enthusiasm for new-look Chrometco.


MORE FROM OUR COLUMNISTS
Most Read
Commented
Ed's Choice
  1. »Impala braced as Rustenburg unions raise ante
    by David McKay | 18 May 2012 11:48
  2. »Platinum outlook worsens
    by David McKay | 21 May 2012 09:58
  3. »Gold Fields claims its own Wafi-Golpu
    by André Janse van Vuuren | 17 May 2012 18:31
  4. »Gold One 'won't pay more' for Ezulwini
    by André Janse van Vuuren | 21 May 2012 16:15
  5. »Law firm raises concern over rights auction
    by Miningmx | 18 May 2012 07:35
  1. » Transnet unveils concept for own coal terminal
    by David McKay | 11 May 2012 11:05
  2. » Tata Power moots SA 'stranded coal' plan
    by David McKay | 10 May 2012 16:20
  3. » Eskom, Anglo negotiate 'cost plus' Kusile deal
    by David McKay | 08 May 2012 11:39
  4. » First Uranium outlines stark choices
    by André Janse van Vuuren | 08 May 2012 22:15
  5. » More creditors knock on LontohCoal’s door
    by Mpho Sibanyoni | 30 Apr 2012 09:01
special reports
News Alert! Subscribe to our Free News Alert
podcastsPodcasts
Big opinions by big guys.
RSSRSS Feeds
News delivered really simply.
jobsJobs
Current listings.
eventsEvents
Current listings.
jseJSE Listed stocks
Real time resources data.
special reportsFREE News Alert!
Subscribe to our News Alert