SA Govt. offers stark choice to community embroiled in Tendele Coal expansion controversy

GWEDE Mantashe, South Africa’s mines minister, offered a stark choice to the KwaZulu-Natal community affected by the proposed expansion of Tendele Coal’s Somkhele mine, saying it should either accept compensation for relocating, or face the prospect the mine will close.

“We have sent a team that has engaged the community there,” he said in a response to a Miningmx question following his keynote address to the Junior Indaba, an online conference. “A part of that community has agreed to move, of course being compensated by the company. There are families that resist that and have basically asked a certain price that we will not announce here, but which is very difficult to meet,” he said.

“Our view is that the community has a responsibility to prove an assessment of which benefit: will it benefit them to move and get alternative areas with the company compensating them for the movement, or close the mine because that is the option”.

Mantashe added that mining companies “… can only do as much as they are able to generate revenue. It’s not that we are going to intervene. We have a team working there already. That’s it”.

Government has been part of negotiations with community representatives via the Inter-Ministerial Task Team which was assembled by the premier of KwaZulu-Natal with the involvement of the Minister of Mines’ Ministerial Task Team.

Tendele Coal said it has negotiated with families affected by the proposed expansion of the mine, but that 17 families were holding out for improved terms. The compensation on offer is disputed: Richard Spoor, a human rights attorney at Richard Spoor Inc. calculated compensation of about R183,000 per family, but Jan du Preez, CEO of Tendele Coal, said the minimum compensation for relocation is R400,000 per family.

The matter grabbed public attention following the killing last month of Fikile Ntshangase, an activist who opposed the expansion. Environmental attorneys are also opposing Tendele Coal’s proposed expansion on the grounds that the expansion area is not correctly permitted in terms of the National Environment Management Act.

The expansion areas are situated away from Tendele’s current operations, the nearest pit of which is just 500 metres from the iMfolozi river, itself 4.7 kilometres from the confluence of the White iMfolozi and the Black iMfolozi.

Activists also argue that in refusing to sanction any compensation to families until all affected have agreed, Tendele Coal has turned the community against itself.

Tendele Coal’s counter-argument is that economic benefits will be lost if the mine is forced to close because it can’t expand.

Already 400 employees at Somkhele have been retrenched after Tendele Coal cut production to 47% of capacity in September. Were it to remain open, around 1,600 direct jobs would be preserved; thousands of other jobs held through local businesses providing services to the mine would also be saved. There are also social benefits that come from mine infrastructure, said Tendele Coal.

2 COMMENTS

  1. The problem with Mtubatuba community are Lawyers of Mcejo and Get Foundation who force people to demand what can not be afforded because these two organisations want to close the mine. It is a disgrace that members of Mcejo who live in our Mtubatuba community have taken a decision to engage Itendele Mine for resolving all challenges facing the community and mine but these lawyers are busy threatening and intimidating the community. Furthermore even 17 families want to conclude their negotiations with the Itendele mine but they are intimidated. The fact is that the average benefit for relocated households is far more that what is stated by Mcejo lawyers . These lawyers are misleading the coomunity. Even people who are members of Mcejo and used to brief media are from Kwa Mthethwa Traditional Authority not from Mpukunyoni Traditional Authority. There is none under Mpukunyoni Traditional Authority community who do not want mine but we all accepted mine yet there are issues and challenges we can resolve together as a community. We have structures from community to safeguard the participation of the community. From Isigodi area we have MINING AREA COMMITTE (MAC) which deals with issues of local neighbors of the mine, we have Direct Affected Committe (DAC) which deals with issues of the proposed relocating people, we have Mpukunyoni Community Mining Forum which consists of Traditional leadership, Municipal leadership, Spiritual leadership, NGOs and NPOs operating in our local community, youth, women , local community , Disability , local business people and other people with interests to deal with all issues of mining in our local community. We are well represented.

  2. Can’t realy blame the community for wanting more money! Look what their national leaders & supposed role models are up to!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here