The Midas touch of Sibanye-Stillwater’s Neal Froneman

Sibanye-Stillwater CEO, Neal Froneman. Pic: Martin Rhodes

This article first appeared in the Finweek April 22 edition.


On the subject of his firm’s speculated merger with Gold Fields and AngloGold Ashanti, Neal Froneman had this to say: “We have at various points in time made suggestions to all the companies that are relevant in size here in South Africa and in North America”.

He added: “We remain active.”

That may be as detailed as Froneman, the burly, plain-speaking CEO of Sibanye-Stillwater, is prepared to get about this year’s most talked about South African mining sector scuttlebutt: the consolidation of its three largest listed gold firms. Despite all the talk, there’s no actual deal as yet.

Asked whether he would consider a hostile bid for either of Gold Fields or AngloGold Ashanti, Froneman responded: “We think that hostile bids are value destructive. Our board has made it very clear to me that that’s not what we’re going to do.”

Froneman’s comments aside, Mining industry sources say Gold Fields and AngloGold Ashanti have had proposals to combine with Sibanye-Stillwater on their desks since the beginning of the year. Were consolidation of both companies by Sibanye-Stillwater to occur, it would create a five million ounce a year gold producer with a combined market value of R463bn.

Whilst this valuation is less than Anglo American, which is capitalised in Johannesburg at R781bn, it is nonethelesss a number that bears comparison with North American gold peers Newmont Mining and Barrick Gold.

Analysts think such a combination of gold industry heavyweights could happen, but they also believe Froneman’s mere suggestion of the matter publicly, in response to a question at his firm’s annual results announcement in February, was a piece of tree-shaking knavery that could have unintended consequences.

“A takeover of AngloGold or Gold Fields will leave a large gap in the SA-listed gold space,” said Arnold van Graan, an analyst for Nedbank Securities in a recent note. “We believe there is another alternative that makes plenty of sense from a strategic and valuation perspective: a merger between AngloGold and Gold Fields”.

The idea that AngloGold and Gold Fields could one day combine is old fare in the mining sector. Speculation linking the two has come and fizzled away – an out of reach ‘holy grail’ given the position the two hold in the history of Johannesburg’s founding metal. This time, however, might be different.

Dennis Tucker, the former investment analyst and a corporate financier who is now strategic advisor to Froneman at Sibanye-Stillwater, says the direction of any deal will ultimately be decided by shareholders. “They will decide whatever is the most accretive,” he says.

In the absence of a pre-emptive tie-up between AngloGold and Gold Fields, which would be hard to do given both companies have recently welcomed new top management, time is on Froneman’s side. By going public on possible gold consolidation, he’s been able to compare relative share price performances between his company and AngloGold and Gold Fields.

The fact is, gold-only companies have performed poorly against Sibanye-Stillwater which has the benefit of its platinum group metal (PGM) production. The gold price has steadily weakened this year, PGMs – especially its minor metals such as rhodium and iridium – have soared to new heights.

The valuation gap between gold firms and PGMs looks set to widen, if only because macroeconomics have improved, which is generally negative for gold. RBC Capital Markets, for instance, has downgraded its forecast for the gold price. “We now forecast average gold prices of $1,732/oz in 2021, a decrease of 5%, and prices of $1,696/oz in 2022, a decrease of 5%,” said Josh Wolfson, an analyst for the Canadian bank. “The macroeconomic backdrop remains challenging for gold,” said Sophie Spartalis, an analyst for Bank of America (Merrill Lynch, Australia).

Set against this, PGM company ratings are improving. Speaking at the Joburg Indaba’s PGM Industry day, an online conference, Evy Hambro, MD of Blackrock Inc. the giant US investment company, said the PGM sector had made such a good fist of debt reduction, that the current discount rate applied to its shares was unjustified.

“In our view, PGM producers continue to be under-owned,” said Tyler Broda, an analyst for RBC Capital Markets.

Said Citi, an investment bank, in a recent report: “Sibanye-Stillwater has the highest leverage in our coverage with a 10% change in PGM prices resulting in a 19% change in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) in our estimates.”

Given the upwards trajectory of PGMs: the premium to gold shares is only likely to widen, making a Sibanye-Stillwater all-share bid for gold consolidation cheaper over time.

“We could sit on our hands and we’ll be a $20bn company in six or nine months’ time (it is currently valued at $13.7bn). We are re-rating almost every day and you can see it in the potential of what we’re going to earn this year,” said Froneman.

The company produced record full-year earnings of R29.3bn in the year ended December, and paid R9.4bn in final dividends after reinstating the interim payout in August. It has all but wiped out debt, unveiled gold and PGM projects worth R6.8bn, and taken a tentative first step into the battery minerals sector with a R714m investment in the developer of a R6bn lithium project in Finland. All this has been achieved at an average PGM basket price significantly below current levels.

We think that hostile bids are value destructive. Our board has made it very clear to me that that’s not what we’re going to do.

“PGMs are entering a period people are calling a super cycle,” said Froneman. “The green hydrogen economy is coming, its coming fast, and we are the number one producer of platinum, iridium and ruthenium and those are the key metals that go into that so there is real upside in having exposure to Sibanye-Stillwater if you hold their (AngloGold, Gold Fields) shares,” Froneman said.

Although sketchy on naming actual targets, Froneman thinks it likely a gold bid is coming. He will make “a very compelling offer to shareholders” when he finds the right target. It’s a question of timing; not an if, but a when.

An irony of speculation linking Sibanye-Stillwater with Gold Fields is that – were it to occur – it would reverse the demerger of only eight years earlier.

Nick Holland, who was CEO of Gold Fields from 2008 to March 2021, had embarked on a strategy of internationalisation. A spate of acrimonious strikes at the Driefontein and Kloof mines, west of Johannesburg, and underground fatalities – nine on Holland’s first day as CEO at South Deep – effectively sealed the fate of the group’s SA gold mines.

In 2013, Driefontein and Kloof, along with Beatrix mine in the Free State, were demerged to create Sibanye Gold, led by Froneman – a gold executive recovering his reputation after the rise and fall of Uranium One, his exuberant but failed energy play. Gold Fields retained South Deep.

It was always conceived that we would not just be a gold company. We were going to be a precious metals company, and more recently we’ve added the battery metals because they are complimentary

Even at that early stage, Froneman said plans were laid to turn Sibanye Gold into a diversfied precious metal firm. First, though, the company had to get its hands around the existing assets.

“Fixing up the non-core assets of Gold Fields and building an industry-leading dividend payer was the first and primary focus,” said Froneman of his first four years at Sibanye Gold. “We have to do that because you can’t embark on M&A if you don’t have a credible operating base,” he added. However, when Sibanye Gold set about M&A activity, it was with vigour not quite seen in SA’s mining sector (see graphic).

In two years from 2016, it conducted deals totalling $3bn (about R45bn) with the $2.2bn acquisition of Stillwater Mining – Sibanye Gold’s first offshore foray – the standout moment. It also ‘bought’ Lonmin in an all-share deal for $290m and before that acquired the Rustenburg PGM assets of Anglo American Platinum as well as bought and exercised a control option over DRDGOLD, the gold retreatment company.

The cost of that buying spree – Stillwater Mining especially – was the suspension of the dividend. This came as a shock to investors who’d earlier heard Froneman declare the payout was a “sacrosanct” aspect of Sibanye Gold’s investment offering. The upside, which could only be seen over time, was an improvement in Sibanye-Stillwater’s market value up from R10bn in 2013 to R195bn at the beginning of this year.

Froneman acknowledges it took time to convince shareholders that diversifying from gold was the right path. “It was always conceived that we would not just be a gold company. We were going to be a precious metals company, and more recently we’ve added the battery metals because they are complimentary … You can only do that when you prepare shareholders for it because they will resist that.

“They want you to either be a gold company or a PGM company. So it takes a while to get your shareholders on board and put forward the benefits of the combination of gold and PGMs,” said Froneman. “That’s not well understood.”

Gold tends to lose its lustre as per the current macro-environment where economic growth is back on the agenda that, not coincidentally, combines with the development and roll-out – not without hiccoughs – of the Covid-19 vaccine.

Economic growth, however, is exactly supportive of wider economic activity, including automotive sales, which in turn is encouraging of PGM production, both in terms of the internal combustion engine, and for new generation vehicles that operate either as petrol/battery hybrids or fuel cells.

Froneman’s 31 years in SA mining began to take shape as director of Harmony Gold during the late Nineties. It was a period of fundamental change for the SA gold sector which had been previously dominated by the major mining houses, General Mining and AngloGold American. The industry was highly centralised in such a way that the houses had investments in separately listed gold firms to which they offered technical services.

The model was burst apart by the restructuring led by Randgold. It formed self-standing companies that were leaner and self-sufficent, such as Harmony Gold. The restructuring created a rare crop of high-achieving executive including Froneman, Mark Bristow, now CEO of Barrick Gold, Bernard Swanepoel, long-time CEO of Harmony, and Brett Kebble. Each, in their own way, was a maverick with a hungry appetite for iconoclasm.

“I didn’t come with the right school tie,” said Froneman who actually attended Northcliff High in Johannesburg before qualifying as a mechanical engineer at the University of the Witwatersrand. “I was considered just an engineer and I was desperate to be something different,” he says of his ambition to be a mine manager.

He failed his blasting exam – unfairly Froneman claims – but eventually made his way into Harmony. “He was integral in formulating what we did at Harmony into the so-called ‘Harmony Way’,” says Swanepoel. “He left to do his own thing at Gold One. I am in awe of guys who can stay hungry for 30 years.”

Between Harmony and Gold One, there were stops at JCI, with Kebble, and Gold Fields which provided the background knowledge he needed for the 2013 Gold Fields demerger, and  Uranium One. Gold One represented Froneman’s climb back up the mining ladder.

No conversation of those early days can pass without mentioning Brett Kebble who passed away in 2005 in mysterious circumstances. Found shot in his car – widely believed to have been as a result of an arranged killing – Kebble had committed billions of rands in fraud shifting shares and cash in JCI.

“Brett was super smart in utilising corporate structures and shares which eventually got him into big trouble,” said Froneman. He doesn’t believe Kebble masterminded his own death. “My personal view is that there is still a story to be told, knowing Brett. I don’t believe for one minute that he tried to commit suicide. I believe he was assassinated.”

Fast forward to today and the natural question is how long Froneman can maintain the “hunger” for corporate life, even in the entrepreneurial airs of Sibanye-Stillwater? He has turned 60, and was quoted in January as saying he would probably retire in two years, but only after doubling the market value of Sibanye-Stillwater first.

He now rows back a bit on that forecast. “I must tell you I don’t find my job boring. I’m still growing. I’ve probably got three to five good years still to put into the business.”

But he’s serious about doubling the size of Sibanye-Stillwater. Mining CEOs are often quoted as being wary about ‘growing for the sake of growth’. Yet in international investment stakes, size counts for something.

The multiples applied to Barrick Gold and Newmont Mining are double those applied to Sibanye-Stillwater, said Froneman. Having market heft would also enable Sibanye-Stillwater to influence the markets. As the biggest platinum producer, Froneman claims his company influenced end users towards the substitution of palladium with platinum. He wants to do the same with rhodium.

Then there’s the strategy to acquire investment holdings in battery metal producers. According to Tucker, the lithium mine investment in Finland has gone largely unappreciated by the market.

“It’s actually with the Finnish government (via a 30% stake in Keliber Oy). The Finnish government has billions of dollars to spend, and where is the top notch mining technology being developed in the world? In Scandanavia,” said Tucker.

The strategy regarding battery metals is still in its formative stages. According to Tucker, Sibanye-Stillwater staked out investible platinum assets for two years before establishing its toe-in-the water investment in Aquarius Platinum, a R4bn deal in 2016.

Accordingly, the Keliber transaction was described as “prudent” by BMO Capital Markets in a report in March. The lithium market surged several years ago before a sharp correction. But Froneman provides a broad strategic take on what’s planned.

I must tell you I don’t find my job boring. I’m still growing. I’ve probably got three to five good years still to put into the business.

“We don’t want to be contract miners to anybody, not in PGMs and not in battery metals. We have learned that having influence on the supply chain and being party to being able to influence the end-user is one where we’ve derived a lot of benefit,” he said.

“We’re not going to buy an autocatalyst plant and build autocatalysts – we’re clear on that. But we’ve got to have exposure to the supply chain to realise all the benefits of being a miner as well.”

It’s hard to know when and where exactly Sibanye-Stillwater will pounce next. Another battery metals investment is being promised but Tucker – who once worked with Swanepoel in Harmony’s famously vituperative takeover attempt of Gold Fields, thinks Sibanye-Stillwater is pointed towards growth that fits the theme of the new supercycle.

“People think supercycles in the mining sector is all about demand. It’s actually about the lack of development in the previous 10 years. Sibanye-Stillwater has huge potential which I think investors will like.”

4 COMMENTS

  1. Neal will be proved right again! SSW:ANG:GFI 250:125:125 will be the market ratio soon, those who can’t see the benefit will be left peddling a merged ANG:GFI at 100:100. The reason the merger makes sense is SSW has the shareholder base that will place a premium on a merged group! Current ANG, GFI shareholders won’t get there! Good luck Neal, the shareholders of all companies would benefit if you can pull it off!

  2. Some strange logic here…
    Why promote PGM companies such as Sibanye to buy companies that will produce this lacklustre product – due to mysterious “macroeconomic factors” (no mention of negative yields which is what actually drives the price of gold in any given currency).
    “Analysts” are predicting lower prices for gold in US dollar terms so why on earth buy them as they will be less profitable in the future.
    When a profit making company buys a company that will make less profit in the future, the larger entity will be less profitable, not more.

    The marketing propaganda to assimilate the gold shares through consolidation is far more tangible than it is justifiable.
    Admitted or not, gold is treated as a currency and all other currencies are priced against it.
    Why are analysts using a US Dollar forecast against local gold miners for the gold price if these companies are producing a fair share of their gold in SA Rand?
    Surely SA rand share prices are related to SA rand gold prices for these local gold shares.
    Why do analysts not quote the meteoric rise of the SA Rand based gold price over the last 15 years?
    Going from R 2500 per ounce in 2004 to over R 30 000 per ounce as recently as last year.
    Where is the mention of the very recent, vastly improved financial results for the local gold shares?

  3. How can a concerned citizen say Gold’s price is lacksustre? The merits of buying it are centuries old, which is what the shareholders of Sibanye recognise. Whatever individual preferences are, surely it has more intrinsic value than Bitcoin?

    Having the right amount of exposure to gold balances the exposure to more industrial type metals. When times are good, PGM’s make money and when there are speed bumps, gold makes money. Having single exposure creates a “roast duck or no dinner scenario” The decision makes sense to me!

  4. Forecasted prices of gold are still viable, in fact lucrative. PGM story is quite compelling given that everything point to sustained momentum, unless something drastic happens, which can derail the green economy. Sibanye has proven that it can turnaround a poor performing asset into a world class revenue generating asset, and it is on that basis that shareholders are likely to give Froneman attention.

Comments are closed.